Criterion –3 - Sai Rajeswari Institute of Technology

Criterion - 3

Key Indicator - 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
3.1.1	The institution’s research facilities are frequently updated and there are well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented 1. Upload Any additional information 2. Provide link for additional information	6
3.1.2	The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research 1. Sanction letters of seed money to the teachers is mandatory 2. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 3. List of faculty who have been provided with seed money for research along with the title of the project, duration and amount year-wise 4. Audited Income-Expenditure statement highlighting the expenditure towards seed money endorsed by the Finance Officer	8
3.1.3	Percentage of teachers receiving national / international fellowship / financial support by various agencies for advanced studies / research during the last five years 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. List of teachers who have received the awards along with nature of award, the awarding agency etc. 3. E-copies of the award letters of the teachers	6

Key Indicator - 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
3.2.1	Total Grants research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and nongovernment sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, endowment research chairs during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. List of Extramural funding received for research, Endowment Research Chairs received during the last five years along with the nature of award, the awarding agency and the amount 3. Copies of the letters of award for research, endowments, Chairs sponsored by non- government sources	5
3.2.2	Number of research projects per teacher funded by government, non-government, industry, corporate houses, international bodies during the last five years 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. List of project titles with details of Principal Investigator, amount sanctioned and sanctioning agency etc 3. Copies of the grant award letters for research projects sponsored by government agencies	2
3.2.3	Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides as in the latest completed academic year 1. Upload copies of the letter of the university recognizing faculty as research guides	3

Key Indicator - 3.3 Innovation Ecosystem

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
3.3.1	Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS), including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge / technology and the outcomes of the same are evident 1. Upload any additional information 2. Link for Any other additional information	10

Key Indicators - 3.4 Research Publications and Awards

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
3.4.1	The Institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research. The institution has a stated Code of Ethics for research and the implementation of which is ensured through the following: 1. Inclusion of research ethics in the research methodology course work 2. Presence of institutional Ethics committee (Animal, Chemical, Bio-ethics etc.) 3. Plagiarism check through software 4. Research Advisory Committee 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. Copy of the syllabus of the research methodology course work to indicate if research ethics is included 3. Constitution of the ethics committee and its proceedings as approved by the appropriate body 4. Constitution of research advisory committee and its proceedings as approved by the appropriate body. 5. Bills of purchase of licensed plagiarism check software in the name of the HEI	5
3.4.2	Number of candidates registered for Ph.D per teacher during the last five years. 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. Ph.D. registration letters / Joining reports of candidates 3. Letter from the university indicating name of the Ph.D. student with title of the doctoral study and the name of the guide	5
3.4.3	Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years. 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. Link to the uploaded papers, the first page/full paper (with author and affiliation details) on the institutional website 3. Links to the paper published in journals listed in UGC CARE list 4. Link re-directing to journal source-cite website in case of digital journals	5
3.4.4	Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher during the last five years. 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. List of chapter / book along with the links redirecting to the source website 3. Copy of the Cover page, content page and first page of the publication indicating ISBN number and year of publication for books / chapters	5
3.4.5	Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation index in Scopus / Web of Science. 1. Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years 2. Any additional information	5
3.4.6	Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus / Web of Science – h-index of the Institution. 1. Bibiliometrics of publications based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-index of the Institution 2. Any additional information	5

Key Indicators - 3.5 Consultancy

Metric No.

Description

Weightage

3.5.1

Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the last five years.

1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
2. Letter from the corporate to whom training was imparted along with the fee paid
3. Letter from the beneficiary of the consultancy along with details of the consultancy fee
4. CA certified copy of statement of accounts as attested by head of the institution
5. Audited statements of accounts indicating the revenue generated through corporate training/consultancy

Key Indicators - 3.6 Extension Activities

Metric No.

Description

Weightage

3.6.1

Outcomes of extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any during the last five years.

1. Upload any additional information
2. Provide the link for additional information

3.6.2

Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS / NCC with involvement of community year wise during the last five years .

1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
2. Photographs and any other supporting document of relevance should have proper captions and dates
3. Detailed report for each extension and outreach program to be made available, with specific mention of number of students participated and the details of the collaborating agency

Key Indicator - 3.7 Collaboration

Metric No.

Description

Weightage

3.7.1

Number of functional MoUs / linkages with institutions / industries in India and abroad for internship, on-thejob training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five yearsOutcomes of extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any during the last five years.

1. Summary of the functional MoUs / linkage / collaboration indicating start date, end date, nature of collaboration etc
2. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
3. List of year wise activities and exchange should be provided
4. List and Copies of documents indicating the functional MoUs / linkage / collaborations activity-wise and year-wise